Challenging Concepts Of The Resurrection
By William H. Bell Jr.
It is clear that for
some, that resurrection can only mean the rising of a human body from the
grave. "What ever there is about man that "lies down" when
he dies, is that which will "stand up" at the time of the resurrection?
What is there of man that lies down at death; is it his soul? Of course not, it
is his body. The word resurrection itself, therefore, suggests the eventual
raising up of the human body." (The A.D.70 Theory, by Wayne Jackson,
p.57).
One of the first
steps in understanding any subject is to grasp an understanding of the terms.
The term "resurrection" is used in a much wider scope than the
average person allows. As above, some confine its use only to a dead body
rising from the grave. However, various sources reveal a wider usage of the
term resurrection.
First,
"resurrection" comes from the Greek word anastasis. This is a
compound word. The first part, ana means "up" and the second, stasis
means "a standing" (from histemi, to cause to stand). Therefore, the very
simple and basic meaning appears to be "a standing up."
Further, when
used as a verb, it can be either transitive (with an object) or intransitive
(without an object). When the transitive form anistemi is used, the object
(that which is raised) does not inhere in the word and is no part of the word.
One must carefully consider the context to determine what is raised. When this
is observed and practiced it will guard one from unwarranted assumptions which
result from an indiscriminate use of the word. On the other hand, the subject
does not inhere in the word when the intransitive form is used. Again, the
context determines who or what rises.
Secondly, an
examination of the various uses of the word will help one to understand the
foregoing comments. The definition of anistemi given by Thayer is, "to
cause to rise, raise up." Observe that Thayer does not say what is raised
up. Next, he lists four usages of the word:
a. of one lying (or
sitting) down;
"And he gave her his hand, and lifted (raised) her up, and when he had
called the saints and widows, presented her alive," (Acts
b. to raise up, to cause to
be born;
"Saying, Master, Moses said, If a man die, having no children, his brother
shall marry his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother," (Matt. 22:24).
"Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to
him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up
Christ to sit on his throne," ( Acts 2:30).
c. to cause to appear,
bring forward;
"For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God
raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all
things whatsoever he shall say unto you, (Acts 3:22).
d. to raise up from death
(both spiritual and physical)
"And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he
hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last
day, (Jno. 6:39).
"This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses," (Acts
From the passages
listed above, consider the following observations. One, the word
"lifted" (KJV) is the word used for the resurrection. Dorcas, after
having been brought back to life, was sitting when Peter extended his hand and
"raised her up," (Acts
Next, the word is
used in reference to bringing one into existence at birth. "Saying,
Master, Moses said, If a man die, having no children, his brother shall marry
his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother, (Matt. 22:24). This denotes a raising
up of that individual yet it is not a raising of his body from biological
death. The figure of "resurrection" as a birth was also understood
and used by Paul. "And he is the head of the body, the church: Who is the
beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the
preeminence," (Col. 1:18). Paul speaks of resurrection as a birth while
the Sadducees used a birth as an illustration of anastasis.
Third, the term
means to cause to appear (manifest or reveal) or to bring forward. "For
Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up
unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things
whatsoever he shall say unto you," (Acts 3:22). Note that God would
"raise up" or cause to stand a prophet. This passage seems to point
to the manifesting of Jesus to
Fourth, the term
resurrection is used to denote the raising up of a body from the dead. "This
Jesus hath God raised up whereof we all are witnesses," (Acts
Fifth, it is used to
signify the raising up of the spirit from spiritual death (Jno.
Sixth, the release
of the soul from Hades was considered as a resurrection. "Because thou
wilt not leave my soul in hell (Hades), neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One
to see corruption," (Acts
Seventh, it is used
to denote the restoration of
"...it is
assumed that the graves are literal graves. This also remains to be proven.
Many mock the idea of the word grave being used figuratively as a synonym for
death, but such usage is common in the scriptures. The word "grave" was
used to picture the national death of
Eighth, the word is
used to denote one standing up or rising out of spiritual inertia or
slothfulness. "Wherefore he saith, Awake thou that sleepest, and arise
from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light," (Eph.
Since it is both
true and acknowledged above by Jackson that "resurrection"
(anastasis) means a "standing up," and since it is true that
anastasis is used in a broader sense than merely to the human body, then it
logically follows that the "object" of anastasis,
be it referent to body, soul, posture, birth, national freedom, or spiritual
development, etc., was in some sense "lying down" or, better said, in
a "non-standing" position. A soul void of a right relationship with
God is a non-standing soul, i.e., dead and in need of anastasis.
A nation held in captivity is a non-standing nation, having lost its freedom
and therefore is in need of anastasis or
"national" resurrection. An unborn child though not physically dead,
is separated from this life by its mother's womb, hence it is non-standing and
in need of birth, anastasis or separation from the
womb. In view of these facts, the transparent glossing over of evidence that
forces dead human bodies to be the object of "resurrection" passages
is objectionable when other options may be valid considerations.
In addition, a
futuristic eschatological resurrection of the body creates a serious exegetical
problem in the text of Romans 8:11. "But if the Spirit of Him who raised
Jesus from the dead dwells in you, He who raised Christ from the dead will also
give life to your mortal bodies through His Spirit who indwells you," (NASV). If there is one indubitable fact in this text it is
that the indwelling Spirit effects resurrection of the body. Three questions
are naturally raised at this point. One, how does one get the Holy Spirit to
presently indwell physically dead bodies? Two, is the Spirit necessary to raise
the bodies of the wicked and if not, how will they be raised? Three, how does
the Spirit indwell dead bodies today in a non-miraculous age? First, the
careful reader will observe that the bodies in Romans 8 were yet alive
physically, but died in some sense both when and only upon the condition that
Christ entered them (v.10). Does "Christ in you" bring about physical
death? What a hope of glory! Second, the bodies in this context were only those
of Christians who were physically alive. Third, the indwelling of these bodies
was by a "then present" (A.D.57) miraculous indwelling of the Spirit
whose "completed" work was future but not removed from the age of the
miraculous--by His Spirit that indwells you. Clearly, this is a
"non-Rover" perspective of bodily resurrection of which the critics
of realized eschatology have very little to say.
Further, could the
"bodily" resurrection of Romans 8 which clearly is non-physical death
be the same as that of I Corinthians 15? The context of Romans carries the
subject of bodily resurrection all the way through to verse 25. This connects
several important eschatological facets, namely, "bodily
resurrection," "heirs," glorified together,"
"revealing of the sons of God," "deliverance of the
creation," "redemption," and "hope." One must ask, WERE
THEY HOPING FOR TWO "BODILY" RESURRECTIONS, ONE BEFORE PHYSICAL DEATH
AND ONE AFTER PHYSICAL DEATH, ALL WITHIN THE ONE FRAMEWORK OF BIBLICAL
ESCHATOLOGY?
Concerning the soul
Here,
Next, other New
Testament writers have affirmed the death of the soul, yet they never affirm or
imply that it ceases to exist.
"For the love of
Christ constraineth us, because we thus judge, that
if one died for all, then were all dead" II Cor.
"And you hath he
quickened who were dead in trespasses and sins" (Eph. 2:1).
"But God, who is rich
in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, Even when we were dead in
sins, hath quickened us together with Christ (by grace ye are saved" Eph.
2:4,5).
"And you, being dead
in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh,
hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses"
(Col. 2:13).
"But she that liveth in pleasure is dead while she liveth"
I Tim. 5:6).
"Let him know, that he
which converteth the sinner from the error of his way
shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins (Jas.
Moreover,
It should be clear
from the above that one cannot deny a spiritual event that takes place both in
time, and within the dimensions of the physical realm, yet undetected by the
physical eye. One could not merely look upon Adam's outward appearance and know
that a change had occurred within, i.e., a fall from his spiritual relationship
with God. The Jehovah's Witnesses are yet unable to grasp this simple but well
attested fact of scripture. The advocates of physical resurrection make the
same error by reasoning in the reverse.
In addition, one
cannot look upon another by physical senses alone and determine whether that
individual is saved or alienated from God. The details following Paul's
conversion adequately substantiate this fact. "And when he had come to
Similarly, the
resurrection of saints from Hades and the change of the "living" as
far as we know, was not perceivable to the physical eye.
The limits of physical observation do not deny, disprove, or otherwise negate
the clear teachings of scripture that the resurrection occurred in 70 A.D., in
connection with the fall of Jerusalem (Matt. 24:31,34; Luke. 21:22; I Corinthians
15). Many could benefit by kicking the "physical observation habit"
to which the Jehovah's Witnesses are "addicted" rather than kicking
against the "pricks" of scripture.