Daniel’s Prophecy of the 70 Weeks
By Thomas Williamson
“Seventy weeks are
determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression,
and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to
bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and
to anoint the most Holy. Know therefore and understand, that from the going
forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the
Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be
built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. And after threescore and
two weeks shall Messiah be cut off but not for him sea and the people of the
prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the .sanctuary, and the end
thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the s desolations are determined.
And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of
the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the
overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the
consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate, “ Daniel
9:24-27.
Daniel’s prophecy of the 70 weeks is one of the most
significant prophecies in the Bible, and one of the most misunderstood.
In this prophecy, the Jews were given the approximate time
of the coming of their Messiah, the Lord Jesus Christ. For this reason, there
was a great air of expectancy among the Jews 483 years after the order by the
Persian king Artaxerxes for the rebuilding of the
walls of Jerusalem in 445 BC (see Nehemiah 2:4-8).
It is generally accepted that the weeks in Daniel
When Christ came, He told the people that “the time is
fulfilled, and the
He would “make an end
of sins,” which can be understood as making an end of the sacrifice for
sins. Christ did this when He offered Himself for our sins once and forever on
the cross, Hebrews
He would “make
reconciliation for iniquity.” Christ made reconciliation for the sins of
the people on the Cross, Ephesians 2:16, Hebrews 2:17.
He would “bring in
everlasting righteousness.” Christ has been made unto us righteousness,
Romans
He would “seal up the
vision and prophecy.” We are told that Christ fulfilled the law and the
prophets, Matthew1 5:17, Acts 3:18, Romans 3:21.
The Most Holy would be anointed, and this was fulfilled when
Christ was anointed to be our Savior, Luke 4:18, 21.
In Daniel
This was fulfilled in 70 AD when the Roman general Titus
came, within one generation of the time of Christ, as predicted (Matthew
23:35-36, 24:34) and destroyed Jerusalem.
In verse 27 we are told that Christ would confirm the
covenant with many (not all) for one week (Daniel’s 70th week). We are told in
Hebrews 12:24 that Christ was the mediator of the new covenant. In the middle of
the week Christ caused the sacrifice and oblation to cease, when He died on the
cross for our sins - at that moment when He was on the cross, the veil of the
temple was torn in half (Matthew 27:51, see also Hebrews 10:18).
This disruption of the temple sacrifices was a sign that
Christ had opened for us the y into the heavenly sanctuary, so that the animal
sacrifices in the
Over the centuries, the great commentators have agreed that
Christ is the One who confirmed the covenant with many (see Matthew Henry,
Matthew Poole, Adam Clarke, Jamieson Fausset and Bro
Edward Young, John Calvin, John Wesley, Geneva Study Bible, etc). The Church
Fathers such as Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Athanasius,
Augustine and Eusebius regarded the 70th week of Daniel as having already been
fulfilled by Christ’s earthly ministry, as did the Venerable Bede, John
Wycliffe, Luther, Melancthon, John Gill, etc.
Take a close look at Daniel 9:24. This verse clearly
describes Christ’s earthly ministry, and tells us that all these things,
including His making reconciliation for iniquity by dying on the Cross, were to
take place within the 70 week period. Therefore, all 70 weeks have already been
fulfilled.
To place the 70th week
in the future is to deny that Christ made reconciliation for Iniquity when He
died on the Cross, which would strike at the very foundations of Christianity.
If Christ did not make reconciliation for iniquity on the Cross, then we may as
well b Muslims or Zen Buddhists.
However, some prophecy teachers in recent times have come up
with an alternative interpretation which places the fulfillment of Daniel’s
70th week into the future.
CHRIST OR ANTICHRIST? They say that the “prince that
shall come” in verse 26 is the Antichrist, and that the Antichrist will make a
seven-year treaty with the Jews in Israel at some point yet in the future. Some
have identified this as any treaty that may be made between modem
There are a lot of mistaken consequences that naturally
arise from this incorrect interpretation of Daniel’s prophecy. This type of thinking results in an irrational, morbid fear of (and
opposition to) any peace agreement between
Not only that, but since there is at this time no Jewish
Temple offering animal sacrifice in Jerusalem, those who follow this theory
feel that it is their duty to help destroy the Muslim Dome of the Rock and
build a Temple on that site.
Some fundamentalists Christians have donated millions of
dollars to Jewish terrorists so that they can attempt to blow up the Dome of
the Rock. The activities of these terrorists have been rejected by the Israeli
government and the vast majority of Israeli people, who do not want to be
plunged into a devastating war over this issue.
How is it possible that these events in Daniel’s prophecy
which were so clearly fulfilled in the First Century AD just as Daniel said
they would be, can be projected 2000 years in the future?
Those who insist that Daniel’s 70th week has not been
fu1fih1ed insist that there must be a gap of 2000 years between Daniel’s 69th
week and his 70th week. In other words, God lied when He said that the prophecy
would be fulfilled within 490 years.
BRIDGING
THE GAP. We
have no right to insert a gap between the 69th and 70th week, any more than we
would have the right to put in a gap off thousands of years between the first 7
weeks and the 62weeks. For us to add a gap in time, where God has not made any mention
of it, is to add to the Word of God, and we are not permitted to do that.
Those who insist that the 70th week is in the future say
that there must be a great slaughter of the Jews when the Antichrist breaks the
peace treaty with them. However, there is absolutely no mention in Daniel’s
prophecy of any one breaking any peace treaty or any covenant with anyone. Read
it again - we are told that He, the Messiah, will confirm the covenant, but
there is absolutely nothing about anyone breaking or abrogating any covenant or
treaty.
In fact, there is nothing in Daniel 9:27 about making any
covenant or treaty. “He,” that is, the Messiah, will not make a new covenant -
He will confirm the covenant that was already in existence between God and His
people.
Edward Young explains the correct meaning of this
confirmation – of the Messiah: The Hebrew
words are unusual. They are sometimes interpreted as though they meant simply
‘to make a covenant.’ Such an interpretation, however, is incorrect, for it
does not do justice to the original which can only mean to cause a covenant ‘to
prevail,’ or ‘to make a covenant firm. The implication is that the covenant is
already in existence and that its terms and conditions are now to be made
effective. ...It is better to regard the subject as the Messiah, since He has
been the most prominent Person in this passage. The covenant which is to
prevail is the covenant of grace wherein the Messiah, by His life and death,
obtains salvation for His people.”
Matthew Poole’s commentary says: “I say then, with Graser, Mede, and others,
that this he is the Messiah, and the covenant He confirms is the New
Testament or covenant…Shall confirm the covenant;’ He shall corroborate it, as
If It began before His coming to fail and to be invalid. ‘With many;’ noting
thereby the paucity of the Jewish church and nation, compared with the great
increase and enlargement by believing Gentiles throughout all nations and ages
of the world. ...“
At the risk of sounding like a broken record, let it be repeated
that there is absolutely nothing here about the Antichrist or anyone else
breaking a covenant with the Jews, as taught by sensationalist “prophecy
teachers.” confirmed, not broken.
Supposedly when the Antichrist comes and breaks the peace
treaty and starts killing the Jews, this will be a fulfillment of Daniel’s
prophecy. But this cannot be true.
In Luke
Virtually all Bible commentators agree that the events
described in Luke 21:20-24 refer to the destruction of
Think about it - if all
the prophecies of vengeance and judgment against the Jews were fulfilled in
70 AD that would include Daniel’s prophecy with regard to the 70 weeks. That
means that the judgments of Daniel 924-27 cannot possibly refer to anything
that is going to happen to the Jews in the future. It was all fulfilled in the
First Century AD.
Everything that Daniel said would happen within the 70
weeks, in Daniel
Since that time, many misfortunes have happened to the Jews,
such as the Spanish Inquisition, pogroms, Holocaust, etc. But none of this was
necessary to fulfill any Bible prophecy, nor is there any need for a mass slaughter
of the Jews in modern
NO FEAR OF THE STORM Here are the implications of a
proper understanding of Daniel’s 70 weeks: Now that we realize that the 70
weeks have already been fulfilled, we need no longer fear a peace treaty
between
Nor do we need to help build a Jewish temple in
Some Christians have developed an unhealthy and unscriptural
fixation on the belief that there must be devastating conflicts in the
This type delude thinking is a bad testimony and it makes
all fundamentalist Christians look like a bunch enthusiasts for war and destruction.
It may help explain the knee-jerk support, from some elements of the “Christian
Right,” for American involvement in any war or “pre-emptive first strike”
anywhere in the
In reality, there is nothing in the book of Daniel, or
anywhere else in the Bible, that says that there must be a temple with animal
sacrifices in
Ralph Woodrow, in “Great Prophecies of the Bible,” says, “The fact is, Daniel
We have seen that the prophecy of Daniel 9:27 was fulfilled 19
centuries ago, within the time-frame protected by Daniel and the Lord Jesus
Christ Therefore, we should stop misusing it as a proof-text for nutty, speculative
notions about “things to come” in the Middle East in the near future.
(From Missionary
Baptist December 2003 issue)
A Jewish Holocaust Again?
Dispensational-minded futurists believe that two-thirds of
the Jews in