|
The Rapture in 2
Thessalonians 2:3 |
|
Written by:Dr. Thomas Ice |
I believe that there is a strong
possibility that 2 Thessalonians 2:3 is speaking of the rapture. What do I
mean? Some pretribulationists, like myself, think that the Greek noun apostasia,
usually translated "apostasy," is a reference to the rapture and
should be translated "departure." Thus, this passage would be saying
that the day of the Lord will not come until the rapture comes before it. If apostasia is a reference to a physical departure,
then 2 Thessalonians 2:3 is strong evidence for pretribulationism.
The Greek noun apostasia
is only used twice in the New Testament. In addition to 2 Thessalonians 2:3, it
occurs in Acts 21:21 where, speaking of Paul, it is said, "that you are
teaching all the Jews who are among the Gentiles to forsake (apostasia)Moses." The
word is a Greek compound of apo " from" and istemi
"stand." Thus, it has the core meaning of "away from" or
"departure." The Liddell and Scott Greek Lexicon defines apostasia first as "defection, revolt;"
then secondly as "departure, disappearance."[1] Gordon Lewis explains how
the verb from which the noun apostasia is
derived supports the basic meaning of departure in the following:
The verb may mean to remove
spatially. There is little reason then to deny that the noun can mean such a
spatial removal or departure. Since the noun is used only one other time in the
New Testament of apostasy from Moses (Acts
"It is with full assurance of
proper exegetical study and with complete confidence in the original
languages," concludes Daniel Davey, "that
the word meaning of apostasia is defined as
departure."[3] Paul Lee Tan adds the
following:
What precisely does Paul mean when he
says that "the falling away" (2:3) must come before the tribulation?
The definite article "the" denotes that this will be a definite
event, an event distinct from the appearance of the Man of Sin. The Greek word
for "falling away", taken by itself, does not mean religious apostasy
or defection. Neither does the word mean "to fall," as the Greeks
have another word for that. [pipto,
I fall; TDI] The best translation of the word is "to depart." The
apostle Paul refers here to a definite event which he calls "the
departure," and which will occur just before the start of the tribulation.
This is the rapture of the church.[4]
The first seven English translations
of apostasia all rendered the noun as either
"departure" or "departing." They are as follows: Wycliffe
Bible (1384); Tyndale Bible (1526); Coverdale Bible (1535); Cranmer
Bible (1539); Breeches Bible (1576); Beza Bible
(1583); Geneva Bible (1608).[5] This supports the notion
that the word truly means "departure." In fact,
Jerome's Latin translation known as the Vulgate from around the time of a.d. 400 renders apostasia
with the "word discessio, meaning
'departure.'"[6] Why was the King James
Version the first to depart from the established translation of
"departure"?
Since the Greek language does not
need an article to make the noun definite, it becomes clear that with the usage
of the article reference is being made to something in particular. In II
Thessalonians 2:3 the word apostasia is
prefaced by the definite article which means that Paul is pointing to a
particular type of departure clearly known to the Thessalonian
church.[7]
Dr. Lewis provides a likely answer
when he notes that the definite article serves to make a word distinct and draw
attention to it. In this instance he believes that its purpose is "to
denote a previous reference." "The departure Paul previously referred
to was 'our being gathered to him' (v. 1) and our being 'caught up' with the
Lord and the raptured dead in the clouds (1 Thess.
Again, how would the Thessalonians,
or Christians in any century since, be qualified to recognize the apostasy when
it should come, assuming, simply for the sake of this inquiry, that the Church
might be on earth when it does come? There has been apostasy from God,
rebellion against Him, since time began.[9]
Remember, the Thessalonians had been
led astray by the false teaching (2:2-3) that the Day of the Lord had already
come. This was confusing because Paul offered great hope, in the first letter,
of a departure to be with Christ and a rescue from god's wrath. Now a letter
purporting to be from Paul seems to say that they would first have to go
through the Day of the Lord. Paul then clarified his prior teaching by
emphasizing that they had no need to worry. They could again be comforted
because the departure he had discussed in his first letter, and in his teaching
while with them, was still the truth. The departure of Christians to be with
Christ, and the subsequent revelation of the lawless one, Paul argues, is proof
that the Day of the Lord had not begun as they had thought. This understanding
of apostasia makes much more sense than the
view that they are to be comforted (v. 2) because a defection from the faith
must precede the Day of the Lord. The entire second chapter (as well as 1
Thessalonians
I wonder if you have noticed the
striking parallel between this verse and verses 7-8, a little further down.
According to your suggestion verse 3 mentions the departure of the church as
coming first, and then tells of the revealing of the man of sin. In verses 7
and 8 we find the identical sequence. Verse 7 tells of the removal of the
Church; verse 8 says: "And then shall that Wicked be revealed." Thus
close examination of the passage shows an inner unity and coherence, if we take
the word apostasia in its general sense of
"departure," while a superficial examination would easily lead to an
erroneous interpretation as "falling away" because of the proximity
of the mention of the man of sin.[11]
But then hee
apostasia of which Paul is speaking, precedes
the revelation of Antichrist in his true identity, and is to katechon that which holds back his revelation (2:6).
The hee apostasia,
therefore, cannot be either a general apostasy in Christendom which does
precede the coming of Antichrist, nor can it be the particular apostasy which
is the result of his activities in making himself the alone object of worship.
Furthermore, that which holds back his revelation (vs. 3) is vitally connected
with hoo katechoon
(vs. 7), He who holds back the same event. The latter is, in my opinion, the
Holy Spirit and His activities in the Church. All of which means that I am
driven to the inescapable conclusion that the hee
apostasia (vs. 3) refers to the Rapture of the
Church which precedes the Day of the Lord, and holds back the revelation of the
Man of Sin who ushers in the world-aspect of that period.[12]
[1] Henry George Liddell and Henry Scott, A Greek-English
Lexicon, Revised with a Supplement [1968] by Sir Henry Stuart Jones and
Roderick McKenzie (Oxford, Eng.: Oxford University Press, 1940), p. 218.
[2] Gordon R. Lewis, "Biblical Evidence for Pretribulationism," Bibliotheca Sacra (vol.
125, no. 499; July 1968), p. 218.
[3] Daniel K. Davey, "The 'Apostesia' of II Thessalonians 2:3," Th.M. thesis, Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary, May
1982, p. 27.
[4] Paul Lee Tan, The
Interpretation of Prophecy (Winona Lake, IN: Assurance Publishers, 1974),
p. 341.
[5] H. Wayne House, "Apostasia
in 2 Thessalonians 2:3: Apostasy or Rapture?" in Thomas Ice and Timothy
Demy, eds., When the Trumpet Sounds: Today's Foremost Authorities Speak Out
on End-Time Controversies (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1995), p. 270.
[6] House, "Apostesia",
p. 270.
[7] Davey, "Apostesia", p. 47.
[8] Gordon R. Lewis & Bruce A. Demarest, Integrative
Theology 3 vols in 1 (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1996), vol. 3, p. 420.
[9] E. Schuyler English, Re-Thinking
the Rapture (Neptune, NJ: Loizeaux Brothers,
1954), p. 70.
[10] House, "Apostesia",
pp. 275-76.
[11] Allan A. MacRae, Letter to E.
Schuyler English, published in "Let the Prophets Speak," Our Hope,
(vol. LVI, num. 12; June 1950), p. 725.
[12] Kenneth S. Wuest, Letter to E. Schuyler English, published in "Let the Prophets Speak," Our Hope, (vol. LVI, num. 12; June 1950), p. 731.