WHAT'S REALLY WRONG WITH
PUBLIC SCHOOLS?
By David H. Chilton
The
usual argument against public education is very convincing. And
very wrong. It runs something like this: Public schools have become breeding grounds
for violence and sexual promiscuity; they often are outlets for socialist
propaganda; they now constitute a formidable enemy of Christianity (by teaching
evolution and prohibiting prayer and Bible reading) and of the family (by
teaching sex education and deriding traditional authority structures). And so
on — which is not an unmitigated tragedy, since it is being
used, under the providence of God, to lead more and more Christians to abandon
the system of public education. No matter what the reason, that is
certainly a good result.
Unfortunately,
the argument above is not as principled as it looks. It is' not an argument
against state education, but only against certain perceived ills of public
schools as they now exist. Thus, even among Christians who agree with the
argument, you will find the following attitudes:
(1)
"The real problems exist in the inner-city schools, but there's nothing
wrong with public schools in a rural, Christian community with traditional
values"
(2)
"We should work to make public schools more moral, by pressuring our
legislators to reinstitute prayer and abolish sex-education"
(3)
"We should try to force the public schools to give Creation 'equal time'
with Evolution."
These and
similar positions all attest to the fact that much of the opposition to public
schools is merely pragmatic: we are very willing for the state to control
education, as long as we can be reasonably sure our children won't be beaten,
drugged or raped in the library. To put it bluntly, we want our socialism, but
we want it clean. If only the public schools would teach what we want
them to teach, we would be happy to have our children's education funded by
legalized theft. Quite an interesting position, philosophically: we'll give our children a "moral" upbringing by
robbing our neighbors to pay for it.
As
Christians, we do not argue against abortion simply by citing the dangers of
malpractice; nor should we consider it sufficient to oppose state education
simply because of its evil consequences. We do not work for safer methods of
abortion; nor should we work to improve public schools. The basic biblical
argument, you see, is that the very existence of state schools is immoral —
regardless of the level of "morality" contained in them.
According
to the Bible (see, e.g., Romans 13:4), the state has an extremely limited
function, which may be summed up in two points: punishing
criminals (as defined by God's law) and protecting the law-abiding. That's it. God has appointed civil rulers as His ministers,
and their responsibility is to administer His laws. The Bible severely
limits the powers of the state — and just in case rulers might misunderstand
the extent of their commission, God built a "strict constructionist"
interpretation right into the law: the ruler "may not turn aside from the
commandment, to the right or to the left" (Deuteronomy 17:20). The Bible
does not give rulers the power to educate children; that responsibility belongs
to the family. State schools are therefore immoral in principle. They exist only
because God's laws have been violated — by greedy
rulers who covet the powers of deity, and by greedy citizens who covet
"free" education at their neighbors' expense. Viewed in this light,
it is no wonder that the public school system has spawned a generation of
illiterate criminals who assume the world owes them a living. Why not? According to their parents, the world owed them an
education; they're just extending the logic.
The rise
in public-school crime and violence is nothing but the humanistic superstructure
built on a rotten foundation. It is quite predictable; in fact, it was
predicted in Deuteronomy 28, the list of the curses which
necessarily fall upon a culture that departs from God's law. If our educational
principles are not founded on God's word, we have shut
God out of our system of knowledge — and committed cultural suicide. Romans
1:28-32 tells us what happens to people who will not have God in their
knowledge: it reads like a modern report card on "citizenship."
"But,"
it may be objected, "if the state doesn't provide
education and force citizens to submit to it, some parents won't bother to do
it themselves." This is true. It is also true that some people don't brush their teeth. We should therefore provide free
dental care and send bureaucrats to each home every morning and evening, armed
with dental floss, to enforce oral hygiene on the population. Right? Where do you draw the line? You draw the line where
God draws it: in His law. God has defined the responsibilities and limits of
the state, and whenever it falls short of those responsibilities, or
transgresses those limits, it is playing god. The inevitable result is national
damnation.
No matter
what objection you have to all this, it falls the ultimate test: conformity to
God's law. When you say the rural, "moral," community-oriented public
schools are still OK, all you're saying is that the
full harvest of apostasy hasn't caught up with them yet. But
the fact that none of your bad checks have returned is no justification of
forgery. Those wonderful schools are possible only by the illegitimate
beneficence of a deified state which plunders your
neighbors to give your kids a free lunch. There's just
no way around it. Public schools are immoral, and always have been — even in
the bygone, halcyon days of old, when students got regular doses of birch rods
and McGuffey readers.
Look at
yourself for a prime example. You went to a "nice" public school, and
you didn't turn out so badly. You didn't
take LSD in 5th grade, you didn't carry a switchblade in Jr. High, and you were
a virgin on Graduation Day. State education didn't
pervert you. Or did it? Consider your reaction
to this essay. (Never mind that I'm begging the
question for a minute.) Regardless of the biblical evidence, you still find it
hard to swallow that the state shouldn't do something
beyond God's requirements. You think the argument that public education
involves theft is somewhat "abstract." Face it: you're
a socialist. Many of your ideas about the proper role of government were fed to
you from K through 12, and it's like pulling teeth to
get rid of them. I'm constantly running into sincere
Christians who are absolutely aghast at the thought of abolishing unbiblical
government regulation. ("How will the mail get delivered?") I even
heard one theologian boldly assert that the value of gold and silver comes
from the paper money behind it!
The real
problem with public schools is that they exist in the first place. They are an
ungodly, unlawful, collectivist institution. The many evils now spewing out of
them derive from the curse of God inflicted on all institutions that defy Him.
He has commanded parents to educate their children in terms of His law; that cannot be done in a public school. If we want our children
to fear Him, to grow into diligent workers for His kingdom, we cannot afford to
train them in an institution which has as its fundamental presupposition that I
am entitled to as much money as I can vote out of my neighbor's pocket.
Prayer doesn't belong in a public school (Proverbs 28:9). Your
money doesn't belong in a public school. Most of all,
your children don't belong in a public school.
Institutions premised on sin must not be redeemed, but abandoned. We cannot
send young maidens into brothels in the interests of "equal time for
chastity." As the light of the world, we must set the standard. Our
Lord never called His people to help build the